Chinese scientists have developed an air–steel flow battery capable of operating for 16 years without loss of efficiency

Chinese scientists have developed an air–steel flow battery capable of operating for 16 years without loss of efficiency

72 hardware

New type of air‑iron flow battery from Chinese scientists

*The Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) has introduced a completely new design for a flow battery system capable of withstanding over 6,000 charge–discharge cycles without significant capacity loss.*

What makes this battery special
Feature Description
Electrolyte Water – completely eliminates the fire and explosion risk inherent to lithium‑ion batteries.
Cost The absence of lithium makes the device “effectively inexpensive.”
Cyclic stability Over 6,000 cycles at a current density of 80 mA/cm² with Coulombic efficiency of 99.4 %. This is equivalent to ~16 years of daily operation.
Power At higher loads, peak power density reaches 392.1 mW/cm² while overall energy efficiency remains at 78.5 %.

How the degradation problem was solved
The key obstacle for air‑iron flow batteries has been low reversibility of reactions and unwanted transport of active species across the membrane.

Scientists:

1. Reviewed electrolyte composition, testing 12 different organic ligands.
2. Created 11 new iron complexes.
3. Identified the most stable one – the complex [Fe(HPF)BHS]⁴⁻.

This compound possesses:

- A protective molecular structure that shields the iron center;
- Negatively charged groups that repel hydroxide ions and reduce their penetration through the membrane.

How the flow battery works
*Liquid electrolytes are stored in external tanks and circulate through an electrochemical cell.*

The advantage of this scheme is simple scalability: by increasing tank volume, energy capacity can be increased linearly. This makes the technology especially attractive for storing energy from solar and wind power plants.

What remains to be done

- At present there are no announced experimental projects or plans for industrial production.
- Successful laboratory results do not always guarantee reproducibility at larger scales.

Nevertheless, if the process can be scaled up, cheap iron could become a serious competitor in long‑term renewable energy storage.

Comments (0)

Share your thoughts — please be polite and stay on topic.

No comments yet. Leave a comment — share your opinion!

To leave a comment, please log in.

Log in to comment